PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURAL VALUES OF THE DESA DAYAK SUB-TRIBE IN SHIFTING AGRICULTURE

Authors

  • Pether Sobian
  • Markus M.Si Universitas Kapuas, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51826/fokus.v22i1.1079

Keywords:

PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURAL VALUES OF THE DESA DAYAK

Abstract

This research is motivated by the author's desire to describe the facts of shifting agriculture the Dayak Desa sub-tribe. Shifting agriculture is not just an activity of burning land, planting rice or harvesting. Shifting agriculture has spiritual values, culture, local wisdom and togetherness. Shifting agriculture is part of the belief that is manifested in the form of a farming ritual system. The purpose of this study is to describe shifting agriculture practices that have been carried out from generation to generation for hundreds of years. There are 9 (nine) stages of shifting agriculture starting from the beginning, namely slashing (manggul) to the end, namely harvesting (ngetaw) which should be carried out by cultivators of the Dayak Desa sub-tribe: 1). Manggul. 2). Nebash. 3). Nebang. 4. Ngeladaq (cleaning the edge of the field so that the fire cannot spread out of the field). 5). Nunu (to burn) . 6). Nayaq. 7). Nugal. 8). Ngemabaw (cleaning the field by pulling the grass). 9). Ngetaw (harvesting rice).

Shifting agriculture in the Dayak Desa sub-tribe version has at least 10 cultural values. These values ​​are; Foraging for food, spirituality, togetherness, caring for the environment, local wisdom (cultivation), Ethics and Law, Joy and gratitude, New Year's Eve and property rights. Terminology in English that is used to designate the farming activities of the Dayak people and especially the Dayak Desa sub-tribe such as the word 'slash and burn' is inaccurate and can lead to misleading interpretations. The Dayak Desa sub-tribe community does not slash land and then burn it, it is true that there are slashing and burning activities in farming activities, but the term 'slash and burn' is not appropriate when used for farming activities. Slashing and burning activities can also be done without farming. The terms slashing and burning are wrong terms so that it can lead to a wrong understanding of farming activities. The English terminology that is closer to the fact of farming activity is 'Shifting Agriculture'

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bungin, H. M. B. (2012). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik dan Ilmu Sosial lainnya. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset. Pustaka Pelajar.

Leksono, A. S., Hakim, A., Setyowati, E., & Zairina, A. (2019). Development strategy of ensaid panjang village natural and cultural tourism in Sintang West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 25(1), 158–162.

Leksono, A. S., Setyowati, E., & Hakim, A. (2017). Potensi dan strategi pengembangan wisata di Sintang. Proceeding Interdisciplinary Studies Seminar (ISS), 71–76.

Lestari, A. A., Wardenaar, E., & Mariani, Y. (n.d.). 2018. Pemanfaatan tumbuhan penghasil warna alami untuk tenun ikat oleh Suku Dayak Iban di Dusun Tekalong dan Dusun Kelawik Kapuas Hulu Kalimantan. Jurnal Hutan Lestari Vol. 6 (4) : 837 – 847.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. (Edition 3). Sage Publication, Inc.

Moleong. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyoutami, E., Rismawan, R., & Joshi, L. (2009). Local knowledge and management of simpunkng (forest gardens) among the Dayak people in East Kalimantan Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Managemen., 257(10), 2054–2206.

Rahu, A. A., Hidayat, K., Ariyadi, M., & Hakim, L. (2014). Management of Kaleka (Traditional Gardens) in Dayaks Community in Kapuas, Central Kalimantan. International Journal of Science and Research., 3(3), 205–210.

Santa, E., Rizalinda, & Mukarlina. (2015). Kajian etnobotani tumbuhan yang digunakan sebagai pewarna alami oleh suku Dayak Iban Di Desa Mensiau Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu. Jurnal Protobiont, 4(1), 58–61.

Sillander, K. (2016). Indigenous Micro-Ethnicity and Principies of Identification in Southeast Boerneo. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 17(2), 102–120.

Sobian, P., Maryunani, Setyowati, E., & Riniwati, H. (2018). Social capital (trust, belief, faith) of Dayak custom community in Ensaid Panjang Village Sintang District West Kalimantan Indonesia. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20(1), 78–83.

Sugiyono. (2003). Metode Penelitian Administrasi: Dilengkapi dengan Metode R&D. Alfabeta. DEWA, Made Handijaya et al. Social Capital as Main Pillar for Tourism Industry. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 122-135, july 2020.

SWABAWA, A. Agung Putu; PEMAYUN, I Dewa Gede Ari; SAGITARINI, Luh Linna. Analysis of Creative Product Potentials of Pandawa Beach, Kutuh Village, Bali. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 113 - 122, aug. 2018.

L.K. H. K. Yuni & J. H. P. Suarthana, 2018. Local Communities Involvement in the Development of Taro Tourism Village, Gianyar. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora [S.l.], Volume 8, Number 3, 260-270.

SUARDANI, Made; SAGITARINI, Luh Linna. The Existence of Local Specialties as a Support for Tourism in North Bali. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 23-32, mar. 2020.

SIBURIAN ROBERT. 2020. Social Dynamics Of The Community In Kerta Buana Village: Change Of Society From Agricultural Activities To Mining. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, Volume 22 No. 3 Tahun 2020

SUJARWO, WAWAN. 2019. Sasak Traditional Villages: A Potential Tourism And Portrait Of Conservation Efforts For Culture And Plants. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Volume 21 No. 2 Tahun 2019

MANAN, M. AZZAM. 2018. Kerukunan Berlandaskan Tradisi Dan Toleransi Keberagamaan: Pembelajaran Dari Komunitas Desa Probur Utara, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Volume 20 No. 1 Tahun 2018

SUKMAWATI, ANGGY DENOK. 2019. Kebudayaan dan Pembangunan di Era Cultural Turn. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Volume 20 No. 1 Tahun 2019

Published

04-03-2024

Citation Check